December, 2025
Washington — The ugly memorial statue removed two years ago from the Confederate Circle of graves at Arlington National Cemetery is now, by order of the Secretary of Defense, to be re-installed where it was originally placed in 1914. Its granite base is still intact. But the order may be in violation of an act of Congress, so it is not clear what will happen next.
The memorial is ugly only in the sense it seriously misrepresented the history of the Civil War, as it incorporated Lost Cause propaganda. In other respects, it remains a remarkable work of art. Descendants of the sculptor, Moses Ezekiel, would like it to be placed at VMI, which Ezekiel attended and where another work of his is located. VMI has agreed.
The post-war idea of a Confederate Circle at Arlington was to promote reconciliation, in the same spirit that Lincoln pardoned Confederate soldiers at war's end. A good solution to the current problem would be to commission a new statue to do just that, a work true to history with no misrepresentations and no political agenda.
There is a moment in history that could be memorialized for the purpose. In May of 1865, a month after Appomattox and soon after Lincoln's assassination, Union General Edward Canby met Confederate General Richard Taylor at Citronelle, a few miles north of Mobile, to formalize the end of the war for all remaining Confederate troops east of the Mississippi. Their meeting was cordial. Canby arranged a luncheon and brought a military band. Taylor wrote of his objective for the occasion:
"We could only secure honorable interment for the remains of our cause."
Note that Taylor was securing an honorable interment for the Confederate cause, just as the Confederate Circle honorably inters Confederate soldiers. Then he recounted this remarkable story:
"The air of 'Hail Columbia', which the band in attendance struck up. was instantly changed by Canby's order to that of 'Dixie', but I insisted on the first, and expressed a hope that Columbia would be again a happy land..." — General Richard Taylor.
When Taylor insisted on "Hail Columbia" instead of "Dixie", he did it in the hope of a reconciled, happy land. Taylor was not simply a Confederate general, he was one of its best battlefield commanders, the son of Zachary Taylor and the brother-in-law of Jefferson Davis.
His hope at that moment, and Canby's, is worthy of memorializing.
If a commission for a statue of reconciliation were offered, it should provide an option for the artist to include a historically accurate portrayal of black people, as this was the major problem with the 1914 work. By General Taylor's own account, there were two black men able to provide motive power to a railway hand-car to transport him to the event at Citronelle. They are potential subjects not only for historical accuracy but for symbolism. Rather than depicting blacks sending soldiers off to war, as in the 1914 statue, these men transport a war-weary general toward making peace.
A new statue dedicated entirely to reconciliation, leaving their ancestors to rest in peace, would please at least some, and perhaps many, descendants of the soldiers buried in the Confederate Circle. As a direct descendant of Confederate veterans myself, I would welcome it, in any worthy medium.